|Why Fairtrade isn't fair
Peter Griffiths The Economist's tale motivational inspirational speaker consultancy provoking change extreme interviewing
'Ethical Objections to Fairtrade' is based on the knowledge that if aid is diverted from the poorest and most needy, it causes death and destitution. This paper shows the damage Fairtrade does to the vast majority of farmers, those who do not belong to Fairtrade. It also shows that most of the extra money that charitable people pay for Fairtrade never gets to the intended recipients. There are no impact studies showing that Fairtrade farmers in general benefit, let along other farmers. Much of the trade is a criminal offence under EU law. Published in the Journal of Business Ethics. Reprinted as Griffiths, P. (2013). Ethical Objections to Fairtrade. In Mark Tadajewski, & Robert Cluley, New Directions in Critical Marketing Studies. SAGE.
Fairtrade in Schools: teaching ethics or unlawful marketing to the defenceless? (pdf) Schools in the UK teach pupils about Fairtrade as part of Religious Education, Personal and Social Education, Citizenship, Geography etc. There are also Fairtrade Schools, where the whole school, including staff and parents, is committed to promoting the brand. It is argued here that promoting this commercial brand to schoolchildren and using the schoolchildren to press adults to buy a product amounts to indoctrination using criteria of intent, methods of teaching, and the subject matter. This conflicts with educational goals. It is also shown to be akin to the criminal offence of Unfair Trading: the methods used in teaching used would be unacceptable in normal commercial marketing. A completely separate criticism, based on a wide range of research evidence, is that the schools mislead by giving false information and by suppression of relevant information, again akin to the criminal offence of Unfair Trading. The question of who has the responsibility for preventing such actions is considered. Published as Griffiths, P., 2014. Fairtrade in Schools: teaching ethics or unlawful marketing to the defenceless?. Ethics and Education, DOI:, 9(3) DOI 10.1080/17449642.2014.978122, pp. 369-384. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17449642.2014.978122.
Fairtrade Comment. Generous consumers pay £1 billion a year extra for Fairtrade products. Nearly all this extra money is pocketed by firms in the rich countries. Most of what is left is spent on extra operating costs incurred in producing Fairtrade, and some Fairtrade cooperatives make a loss from their Fairtrade membership. Any money left over is spent on social products which may have no economic impact. The farmers do not receive a higher price for Fairtrade and may receive a lower price. Their costs when producing Fairtrade are, however, higher, so their net income is lower. All these established facts contradict the assumptions in the recent paper by Tedeschi and Carlson, so their argument is incorrect. Published in the Journal of International Development
BBC World Business Report My criticisms lead the report. Fairtrade Foundation UK will not appear on a platform with me because I produce hard research evidence. So they got someone from the Netherlands. Note that he does not give figures for extra amount paid by consumers, amount going to the Third World, or any extra amount paid to farmers. Nor does he suggest that there is any impact study meeting the standards of the development agencies (there are not). And he does not mention that the Chief Executive of Fairtrade International, as well as researchers have said that the auditing and monitoring of the system is woeful.
'Lack of Rigour in Defending Fairtrade' (published in Economic Affairs) shows some of the mistakes and lack of logic of the Fairtrade proponents, using the example of Alastair Smith.
Rejoinder: False Statements, Misrepresentation and Distortion in Defending Fairtrade, (summarized in Economic Affairs) shows some of the very poor scholarship that sometimes appears.
Refutation: Does Fair Trade deliver on its Core Value Proposition? shows some more very poor scholarship, by Arnould, Plastina and Ball (2009).
Peter has spoken on Fairtrade
If you have trouble viewing these, see my videos
Some articles on Fairtrade
In a wide-ranging review of research on Fair Trade, Laura Raynolds of Colorado State University found that ‘there is surprisingly little research that documents how individual producers, producer organizations, grower households and communities benefit.’ Raynolds, Laura T. (2002) ‘Poverty alleviation through participation in Fair Trade Coffee Networks: existing research and critical issues. Eight years later she still can come up with no hard evidence.
Marc Sidwell, Unfair Trade, Adam Smith Institute, London 2008. http://www.adamsmith.org/publications/economy/unfair-trade-20080225961/
Philip Booth, The Economics of Fairtrade: a Christian perspective. http://www.iea.org.uk/record.jsp?type=book&ID=437
Colleen Berndt, Is Fairtrade in Coffee Production Fair and Useful? – Evidence from Costa Rica and Guatemala and Implications for Policy. George Mason University. http://www.chaight.com/Research.htm [now Colleen Haight].
… revealing …committed … Sparkling. He brilliantly elucidates The Economist
It’s pacey, it’s exciting and it all really happened.” Daniel Davies
“El Economista Furioso”
"Vivid observation and pace of action" Weekly Telegraph
"a keen eye and fluent tongue” Jeremy Osner CIBC World Markets NY
"The Westerners are finally talking. We should listen."
|Hear Peter speak|
|Peter's experience and clients|
|Contact Peter Now|